Request a Consultation

Arnav Gupta
Arnav Gupta Posted on Jul 24, 2025   |  6 Min Read VP-Technology Specializing in Low-Code platforms like Power Platform, OutSystems, and UI Path, I help businesses streamline operations, reduce costs, and enhance customer experiences through digital transformation.

From requirement gathering to coding to testing, AI tools are helping developers reduce grunt work and accelerate delivery timelines. Yet, concerns about safety and reliability remain. This blog explores how CTOs and engineering leaders can stay ahead. It dives into real-world success stories, a three-phased roadmap, practical frameworks, and so much more.

Introduction

While many programmers have most likely tried their hands on Gen AI tools such as GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, and Tabnine to generate code, predict bugs, and automate testing. Still, its widespread adoption at the enterprise level is in its early stages. Challenges like high upfront costs, integration, and unclear ROI remain. Additionally, concerns regarding trust, over-reliance, and consistency are also being actively evaluated by organizations. This makes the decision to transition to AI-infused software development lifecycle (SDLC) rather challenging.

AI Assisted Software Development

However, persisting with traditional SDLC is no longer a viable option in today’s fast-paced market, as the process in this case is often linear. Rigid. And resource intensive. Which begins with developers writing code, and the QA team manually testing hundreds of variations before the app can be deployed. It can take several weeks to complete. Not ideal in 2025.

So, how can CTOs bring their SDLC into the future safely and ethically? This article explores that and more through practical use cases and real-world examples.

The Innovation Bottleneck with Traditional SDLC

Imagine a mid-sized insurance company that wants to develop a customer-facing app that enables users to explore insurance products, automate renewals, file claims, and receive personalized savings recommendations.

In a traditional SDLC, developers begin by writing code for each feature, from digital onboarding to claim submission. The QA teams then manually test hundreds of variations (including but not limited to): What if the server is slow or unresponsive during claim submission? How does the app respond to incomplete form entries? Such edge cases demand exhaustive validation. These cases might also trigger bugs. That’s why it can take anywhere from a few weeks to several months to refine accuracy and deploy a steady app to the market.

Now, multiply that delay across every new feature launch or update. Because your product and sales teams will gather real-time customer feedback that might be hindering engagement or conversion rate and suggest updates for improvement. Therefore, your programmers also need to be prepared for this.

That’s why relying solely on the traditional SDLC approach may not be effective. Simply put, it’s no longer sustainable. That’s why the future lies in AI-native software development. McKinsey reports that it can enable faster, more customer-centric, and high-quality innovation by automating coding tasks, detecting bugs early, and scaling based on user behavior and adoption patterns.

What Really Makes AI a Gamechanger in SDLC?

Gen AI helps teams code faster. By embracing AI, companies can empower product managers, engineers, and their teams to spend more time on quality work and less on mundane tasks. And we have studies to support our statement. For instance, in early 2025, Citizens Bank observed a productivity boost of 20% among a group of engineers using generative AI in a test case.

Therefore, it wouldn’t be inaccurate to say that AI is redefining how teams build solutions today. Here’s what that looks like in practice. (But please note that this is a generalized use case and may vary depending on your development environment, team maturity, and other factors).

Different stages of the SDLC AI capability Result (The impact)
Requirement gathering and planning

Analyzes user stories, specifications, and descriptions such as meeting notes. Also helps flag missing requirements, early risks using ML models.

Tools: Static analysis tools, custom ML

Enhances requirement clarity and detects flaws early on.
Coding and Development

Generates intelligent codes, including initial design models and UI mockups based on requirements and user feedback.

Tools: GitHub Copilot, Cursor, ChatGPT

Speeds up coding; automates repetitive tasks.
Testing & QA

Performs a variety of test cases, including integration tests and end-to-end tests. Also, suggests appropriate fixes.

Tools: Mabl, Testim

Automates thousands of test cases; adapts to UI changes.
Monitoring & Ops

Empowers the teams to monitor system performance and identify anomalies in run time.

Tools: Datadog, New Relic, Splunk

Detects issues before they impact end-users

Can AI be Trusted?

Even with capabilities like that, it wouldn’t be wrong to infer that thoughts around AI reliability and privacy linger in everyone’s mind. After all, no company would want to compromise on the platform or app their business depends on to operate or engage the target audience.

A recent RevealBI survey found that 45% of U.S. tech leaders report AI code reliability issues. Even developers are divided. According to the Devlink Developer Survey 2025, while 91% of respondents use AI tools regularly, only 31% of them feel that it boosts productivity. The sample size for this survey exceeded 65,000 developers.

This highlights another important fact that AI isn’t plug-and-play. It needs structured adoption. Adaptability. Contextual clarity. And governance. So, CTOs and other tech leaders must focus not just on tool integration but on enterprise readiness. This includes asking several questions, but surely not limited to:

  • Are the dev teams trained enough on emerging gen AI tools?
  • Can our current SDLC tools and pipelines support seamless AI integration?
  • Do we have the skills and bandwidth to audit AI-generated outputs?

As the AI momentum accelerates, software development teams are under immense pressure to deliver the expected results both faster and more accurately. And as we have observed, getting there without the help of AI isn’t possible in today’s time. This is a dilemma.

A Three-Phased Roadmap for the CTOs

AI adoption doesn’t need to begin with a massive transformation. It doesn’t have to be a complex and trial-and-error process. A better approach is incremental. Tech gurus can start with a quick self-assessment such as:

  • Are testing and QA processes slowing down product releases?
  • Are there specific phases in the SDLC that consistently cause delays or rework?
  • Is the team using AI? If yes, where in the workflow do you see the most noticeable improvement?
  • If not, have you identified people who can pilot AI adoption more efficiently?
  • Are there guardrails in place to prevent AI from introducing biased or risky logic?

This quick self-diagnosis is crucial for the CTOs. It can help identify high-friction areas in the SDLC. It also surfaces gaps in team readiness, governance, and data infrastructure. And that’s how you get one step closer to scaling AI adoption seamlessly and responsibly.

That brings us to the next step, execution, or the “three-step AI adoption roadmap.”

Phase I: Identify Bottlenecks:

Using real-time metrics and your team’s input, analyze your current SDLC. Look for stages that frequently delay releases, require grunt coding work, and excessive testing.

Phase II: Pilot AI Tools:

Now, there are many AI tools available on the market. You can research and select one or two tools aligned with your immediate pain points for test automation or code analysis. Then, run a small-scale pilot project. This will give you a base for comparison.

Phase III: Scale and Integrate:

If you spot any measurable gains from this pilot project, the next step could be to expand its usage to other teams. Apply AI at different stages or phases of the SDLC. Gradually integrate AI into your CI/CD pipelines and DevOps toolchains to assess if AI works smoothly at scale as well. Soon, it can become a natural extension of your delivery process.

All this without impacting the existing frameworks or affecting the quality of work.

Closing Thoughts: Break Free from Legacy SDLC with RAPIDIT

But it’s easier said than done. You’ve likely come across similar roadmaps before. But the difference lies in execution. At Damco, we walk the talk. We’ve helped companies do all of the above and more, thanks to our comprehensive domain expertise and hands-on experience across industries.

Take, for instance, a leading global Healthtech provider. With our AI-native software engineering framework, RAPIDIT, they successfully built and launched a new feature in just 6 days. Their delivery timeline was cut by more than half from 2 weeks to a mere 6 days. This wasn’t just automation; it was augmentation, made possible by:

  • AI agents embedded across SDLC- not replacing, but enhancing engineers
  • Faster delivery, higher transparency, and better code quality
  • Leaner teams= higher productivity
  • Guidance MCP that grounds the code generations

It empowers programmers to do more with less. Helps minimize errors. Development cycle. And accelerate the timeline.

So, whether you’re just beginning your AI journey or looking to scale responsibly, RAPIDIT can be your accelerator.